Garrett:

Way, way back when the earth had barely cooled, I used a set of Symbol
and the other barcode scanner, either standalone/dockable or tethered
to a laptop. It's a lot of expensive, dedicated hardware,
pain-in-the-neck, multi-step syncing, etc. If you were doing warehouse
inventory all day, it might make sense, but it feels like overkill.

I have two  suggestions, perhaps out there a bit, but what else would
you expect from me :) ?

a) Hi-tech: smart phones and tablets are perfectly decent barcode
readers. Build (or rent) a wedding register website and use the
phone/tablet to scan items into the wishlist. This can be a great push
if the store is considering an online storefront.

b) Lo-tech: print out a checklist of your inventory and have the clerk
check off the items using clipboard and pencil. Advantages: cheap,
off-the-shelf hardware, no batteries to run out, don't have to reboot
it while the customer waits, even works upside-down! Enter the data on
the POS system during slow moments.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Garrett Fitzgerald
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm looking at adding remote scanning functionality to a POS system
> for a small store. Given people's past experience, does it make more
> sense to get a wireless dumb scanner that sends keystrokes to a
> back-room app, or a smart scanner that stores up the list of UPC codes
> and uploads them all at once? Thanks.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sWLVgH=xee+q4ct6tsfntw-uzv7yeuk6y0hinfstk...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to