Hey Lou,

Sorry to have pounced on VB so much, although it was purely based upon
what I have heard. Actually, in think it was just brought up very
recently on another thread in this list.

Believe me, if I had heard more positive things about it, and it was
more popular (for getting a future job) - I would have seriously
considered it. Nothing I would have liked better than going to a
language that harks back to the good ole days - since I started out with
BASIC back in 1980 in high school. Its what basically got me started -
and kinda led me to where I am today (whether that's Good or Bad, that's
debatable!)...

One thing I heard, if I remember right - as I don't remember where I
read it - that VB seems not to be as much truly object-oriented as
something like C#. And, I think that was one of the complaints that
someone had made about VB. 

-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Lou Syracuse
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:12 AM

IMHO it is not so much that VB.Net is BAD per se, rather that C# has
become more mainstream.  

I've done quite a bit of work with VB.Net over the years and found it to
be an easier transition from VFP.   But there is much more C# work out
there to be had, and you'll find far more code samples written in C#
than VB online as well as in printed booiks.  For anyone getting into
.NET I would recommend C#, but don't feel VB is _that_ bad an option
either.

I'm learning C# and intend to use it going forward.   As always, YMMV

Lou



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
...

The one reason I am considering C#/.Net is that the co. I work for
already owns Visual Studio. As such, there is no extra costs for me to
try and develop with it. Maybe I could even use something else within
the Studio - although NOT VB - since I've heard too much bad stuff about
that. 
...

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to