On Mon, May 14, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> One thing I heard, if I remember right - as I don't remember where I > read it - that VB seems not to be as much truly object-oriented as > something like C#. They were probably talking about Visual Basic 6, i.e. not VB.NET. The former has some objecty things about it, but you wouldn't call it a fully OO language. The latter is as OO as C#, and that's one of the problems with transitioning from VB6 to it. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1337009940.5094.140661075350069.33497...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
