Your comments match my experience exactly. Some of my clients got infected from hacked web pages and Avast never detected them. Their engineers will readily admit that this class of virus can be tweaked to bypass any antivirus program which is why I install Malwarebytes and Spybot on all of my clients' machines.
Avast does not noticeably affect performance like competitors packages. >>Avast was pretty good with a, not at all with b, and terrible with >>c....although your mileage may vary. And yes, I even bought 10 Avast >>licenses for one client and they still had pop ups on the screen down by >>the system tray. I am soooo tired of answering "What was that blue box >>there for down by the clock this morning when I turned on my monitor?" > > For a networking situation you can get Avast! Business Pro, and manage the > anti-virus clients from a server (doesn't require an actual server OS). It > does take some tweaking to get it to perform unobtrusively. But if all you > want it to do is monitor incoming email, traffic across websites, and > opening of files, then once you have it configured it will do all that > without being obtrusive. > > I'm no Avast evangelist. No anti-virus software, despite claims to be able > to use "heuristics" to detect "patterns" and "templates", effectively > defends against malware that it does not specifically recognize in > detail--that is, malware that the anti-malware company has not already > identified and planned for. Even if you update your definitions every > couple of hours, all real-time anti-malware programs as well as > after-the-fact scanners miss things. That's why you need one real-time > program and two manual scanners and you need to do regular scans with all > of them. And all of them will also identify a certain number of false > positives. Nothing is perfect. > > But IMO Avast as a program is more efficient in its use of system > resources, and a much more honest corporate citizen than AVG. It's more > flexible than Trend Micro. And I can't see why anyone would trust a > Microsoft "security" product when it's Microsoft that creates the security > problems with its swiss-cheese operating systems in the first place. > > As for user behavior: These days malware can infect a computer even when > the user has updated real-time anti-malware scanners running, is running a > restricted account, using a browser other than IE, and has not manually > interacted with anything other than their standard software, and the user > will not even know it has happened. All it takes is visiting an infected > website, once--and there's no predicting which websites will be infected. > The only way to "educate" users effectively to avoid getting their > machines > infected is to disconnect their machines from the internet or turn them > off > completely. > > Ken Dibble > www.stic-cil.org > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/A77D54B7FA2D45D1BC1AEB4180BD214F@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
