Having read no articles from any o those sites, I'd have to say that they would be irrelevant as well. You might want to be more careful about spreading your favorites list around tho.
Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Oct 29, 2012, at 10:03, Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]> wrote: > El 29/10/12 13:55, Michael Oke, II escribió: >> It's not clearly part of the article when you are reading it on your phone. >> I had already looked up the answer but it doesn't matter what Lincoln' party >> is in comparison to today as that has no relevance. I wondered about recent >> history and found just what I expected. That is another worthless >> endorsement that is meaningless. > > OTOH, all the articles *they* cite, coming from killtheniggers.com, > anyoneleftofhitlershouldbeshot.com, goMussolini.org, > allthatmattersisbigmoney.com, etc. are /*really*/ relevant, useful and > meaningful. > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
