On 10/29/2012 11:26 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 10/29/2012 07:36 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 10/29/2012 01:00 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 10/29/2012 12:50 PM, lelandj wrote:
all the way back to the NY Times first endorsement of Abraham
Lincoln in
1860.
The Republican party of Abraham Lincoln is the Democratic party of
today, ( eg the abolism of slavery was a very progressive idea in
Lincoln's day).
Hi Leland,
I know that your granddaddy owned slaves and you are trying to make up
for it. OK, on that ONE issue.
I do not recall being taught in school that the R party in the 1860s
hated America, was out-and-out atheistic and came out for socialised
medicine, gay marriage and abortion.
If the D party were really the same old D party I still would not be a
D, but I would not consider it crazy, which I do.
Drugs, Leland, you need drugs . . .
You really do live in a world all your own.
Do I. Consider this: You post something ultra left D partisan. Where
are the other Ds? Nowhere. You are the one living alone.
Has the great art and mystery of politics no apparent utility? Does it
appear to be unqualifiedly ratty, raffish, sordid, obscene and low down,
and its salient virtuosi a gang of umitigated scoundrels? Then let us
not forget its high capacity to soothe and tickel the midriff, its
incomparable services as a maker of entertainment. -- H.L. Mencken, "A
Carnival of Buncombe"
Regards,
LelandJ
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
