Hey Frank - I gotta agree - I find Screens easier to maintain as well. As for SCX's being slower than PRG's - and someone followed up with some Stats - I think those stat's are old. I only say that - because computers are SO Much faster these days - that I don't think it would generally be noticeably slower to a user whether its SCX or PRG's. IMHO.
I also just wanted to follow up & say - my Boss is LOVING what I have been doing. Its all coming along - creating this conversion program - and so far its working well. Of course, I'm still working on the program - its not ANYWHERE Near completed. But, it does A LOT So far! So, I'm still plugging away at it... L8r, -K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Frank Cazabon Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:58 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Screen Hacking & a Problem... Hey Dan, I would think that "harder to maintain" is very subjective as I find them much much much easier to maintain than PRGs. Do you have some statistics to backup your assertion that running an SCX is slower than a PRG (I have no doubt it is, but I'd like to see by how much). Thanks Frank. Frank Cazabon On 16/01/2013 05:17 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > an SCX is both slower in operation and harder to maintain [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/293128BE8A954550A1E043A4A5DC887B@Programming2 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
