Hey Ted - I got it! I followed Ur suggestion - listed out the ASC of Char's
in the Reserved3 field, after adding Custom Methods by hand to a Form - and
now I found that each line had not JUST a Char(13) - but, it had a CHR(10) -
and the 10 was what did it. Now it works!

Thanks again. And - yeah - I'm still going to look at the link you gave and
those resources from MS in FileSpec Folder!

-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted
Roche
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: More Screen Hacking & Custom Methods...

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Kurt <[email protected]> wrote:


>
> About a missing Char, well, I already add in at the end - a Chr(13) +
> Chr(0), which I've already been doing for the Methods property - and it
> should supposedly work for the Reserved3 field as well - I AssUMe - since
> its also a Memo field. But, of course, I could be wrong about that.
>
>
Let's not go all Cargo Cult, here. You've got the tools to figure this out.
Use a copy (a copy!) of a form, grab the memo field into a string, and loop
through the string, printing out the ASCII value of each character. See
what the delimiters are.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/972BABB159E340EAA0766FE312ABC8B1@Programming2
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to