On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Virgil Bierschwale <[email protected]>wrote:
> Interesting comment Steve. > > You apparently believe we have nothing to do with accountability to past or > future generations. > If we promised those former UAW workers benefits, we owe it to them. > > If we can't pay them what we owe them, then perhaps we need to find > executives that can do the job without raping and pillaging their company. > > What I find ironic is those that say we shouldn't honor our obligations to > other workers will bitch the most when their own benefits are not honored. > ---------- > Virg it was a statement about support costs that carry forward to new products. It was not a condemnation just an example of how out of control the suggestion can get. Granted that has changed after 2008 when the unions got billions of $ for health benefits from the big 3 and now the union is responsible for what benefits are going to be. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYK=vfOyB+YOqXmcK0_ZCjv=rcgdftzqkwv1hyhfbzs...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
