Many times, these web services came with examples in .NET or other technology. There's a web service testing utilities such as SOAPUI and Fiddler (as Tracy Pearson said) that allow you to test out things. One of the features is that you can strip out all of the 'magic' and reveal the raw HTTP Post behind the scenes.

As Ed Leafe was hinting at, the 'S' in SOAP is anything but simple. I found it easier, and much much faster, to get to the raw post, merge in my values with the proper structure required for the SOAP posting, and rock on from there. What was taking VFP 2-5 seconds to instantiate the XML DOM, etc. and make the post, I could post in 0.1 seconds ... but with some hand coding using templated files and TEXTMERGE.

Yes, if the WSDL changes then you're screwed, but most web services don't change the web service unless they have a major revision change. By then EVERYTHING has changed and it's time to start over anyway.

Web services using SOAP stink IMHO. They haven't lived up to the promise. Of course EDI is a nightmare. Web Services using JSON might be marginally easier to work with raw but most use SOAP based on my experience. Frustrating.

I guess I just think differently and I'm not willing to jump through Microsoft's SOAPy hoops.

On 05/23/2013 11:21 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
Kevin -- not sure I follow you. Are you saying you just basically went to the web page, manually did what you would (to find out the resulting url), then plugged that into your code, then screen-scraped the results of the final page?

I'm sure I'm wrong but I wanted to get more details.




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to