+1. -K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Copeland Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Checkbox Color - Solved
And they all lived happily ever after. I love a good ending. Mike -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Checkbox Color - Solved From: Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 6/27/2013 1:47 PM > If the backcolor is not white I set the Style to 1 which is graphical > and BackStyle to Opaque and if the color is not which it make a nice > looking button. > > Problem Solved. > > Thanks for your help > > Jeff > > --------------- > > Jeff Johnson > [email protected] > (623) 582-0323 > > www.san-dc.com > www.arelationshipmanager.com > > On 06/27/2013 10:30 AM, Fred Taylor wrote: >> I think Mike's graphical style would be your best bet. About the only >> other way would be to create a shape object with the BackColor you >> want and >> place it over the checkbox portion and control it's ZOrder in regards to >> the checkbox. You'd then also need a second shape with the checked >> value. >> This gets messy in a hurry, but could be rolled into a class. The >> graphical option seems much easier, maybe with a separate label for the >> text. >> >> Fred >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Many of my users have Windows 7 where VFP form colors are very close to >>> VFP control colors. I have it working where the users can select the >>> background color for textboxes, editboxes, comboboxes & checkboxes. >>> There >>> does not appear to be a way to make the background of the little >>> check box >>> change. It is only white. The backcolor refers to the label part >>> of the >>> checkbox if it is opaque. >>> >>> Does anyone know of a way to change that? >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff >>> >>> --------------- >>> >>> Jeff Johnson >>> [email protected] >>> (623) 582-0323 >>> >>> www.san-dc.com >>> www.arelationshipmanager.com >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Post Messages to: [email protected] >>> Subscription Maintenance: >>> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailma n/listinfo/profox> >>> OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** >>> listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> >>> Searchable Archive: >>> http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/p rofox> >>> This message: >>> http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/51CC71DD.7060406@** >>> san-dc.com<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] m> >>> >>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the >>> opinions of >>> the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This >>> statement >>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see >>> the >>> obvious. >>> >> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >> multipart/alternative >> text/plain (text body -- kept) >> text/html >> --- >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/40401CC39A934FEAA9ECC837827EDEFD@Programming2 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
