Why not just decompile the content (or never compile it in the first place) and ship a folder of HTML, CSS (and, if needed, JavaScript) that the user can open on their own machine in the browser of their choice?
I thought the CHM was a promising format when MS first debuted it, but it just became another proprietary format, undersupported and not fully thought out. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi foxgang > I have for years used chm for help files. But it seems harder to get them > working. Ok its easy where the properties has unblock. But where there is > no > unblock, I assume because of network policies, what do you do. > I suppose the question is what are we supposed to use for help files if chm > is not available (thank you bloody Microsoft) > Is there another way. Other than on a web site. > Al > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sZwVq9+3-EQQPkrRRnYNaEiK=Ky+0MDF8RLshL=wm...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
