Th release of their "free controls" for VFP was really the mindless thrashing of an animal waiting to be put out of its misery. I guess the wanted to make a quick buck out of people who "maybe" bought the full version.
As you say Al, there are better 100% VFP versions available with source code. Dave -----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 03 October 2013 08:29 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: VFP9 install on 64-bit new laptop? I'm not surprised. Most of their stuff is something doable in VFP anyway hence overpriced. And the offers of 2 for 1, what is the use of 2 of the same for a single programmer? That annoyed me and the fact that even a half price was overpriced. Al -----Original Message----- What really irked me was that it is obviously a bug and I was actually trying to inform them of the problem, not get it fixed. I mean, sure, if they knew of a solution that would be fine, but my assumption was that one of the supporting Windows DLL files in Win 7 Home was different (or missing) when compared to Win 7 Pro. I think they were in a hurt for money. [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
