Bryant Minard Medford Software House
Sent from my iPad > On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Mike Copeland <[email protected]> wrote: > > I find TBird to be quite capable and worthy of use. > > Yes, it does get a little "numb-brained" (unresponsive) when receiving email, > especially large Qs and email with attachments. I assume it isn't > multi-threaded? > > But I've got clients with, literally THOUSANDS (21,000+) emails in their > inbox and they keep on trucking. > > My acid test for an application is "no loss of data" and "features do what > they are supposed to." If it also has issues with getting sludgy when it is > busy, well, that can be as much the fault of supporting structures (network, > OS) as the application itself. I mean, I don't have any other email > application to compare it against. > > I especially like the calendar add-on...very capable. > > Mike Copeland > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [NF] Installing a new email client (on new laptop) > From: MB Software Solutions General Account > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 11/19/2013 2:46 PM >> I had used Thunderbird in the past, but I saw some comments here recently >> that said the latest version wasn't too great (kinda clunky or cluttered?) >> and so I wanted to poll the list to see what's popular in terms of an IMAP >> email client. >> >> Thanks, >> --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
