If I could work exclusively in VFP9, I'd have to agree cursor adapters
would be the tool of choice.  VFP7 didn't have them.  I wish I could
convince TPTB to use VFP9, but they'd rather spend the time (and money),
re-writing in .NET.

Fred


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:00 PM, AndyHC <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you want to reduce clutter at least look at cursoradapters - they
> include GetFldState level info and lots more, and they offer a lot of
> advantages apart from helping with validation.
> There's plenty of stuff on them in Help!
>
>
> On 23/11/2013 01:42, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>> At 11:55 2013-11-21, Fred Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a sample that should show you how to do it.  Just cut and paste
>>> into
>>> a .PRG and run it.  Note the Form DataCheck method and the
>>> Grid.BeforeRowColChange code.  Uses data buffering, GETFLDSTATE and
>>> OLDVAL.
>>>  I tried to remove as much "clutter" as I could, so I hope you can at
>>> least
>>> follow it.
>>>
>>
>>      I had forgotten about the getfldstate() function.
>>
>>      Yes, your code is uncluttered, but I am going to have to add some
>> clutter of field-level and row-level validations to make sure that these
>> all play nice and work as wanted.  (An optimist would use "expected", but I
>> am past that.)
>>
>>      I will have to work on this for a while.  Thanks for the lead.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Gene Wirchenko
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajcbksopkjjrakb-v+zs3fl_rwgqehucbpibjegw-zk2kt0...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to