I receive faxes a couple of times a week, I receive at least three letters at home, three at the office and three in the PO Box. I also received emails at two addresses. When they did that auto-renew thing I sent them a strong email which said I didn't want my FoxTalk and I didn't want to receive any correspondence whatsoever. They said they would take me off of the auto-renew list and they were sorry I didn't like their marketing techniques.
I still get all of the faxes and renewal letters as well as my two copies of FoxTalk. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FoxTalk vs. FoxPro Advisor Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote: > >> Just received my November issue of FoxPro Advisor. Great issue jammed >> with interesting articles and lots of color. I would rate this issue an >> A or A+. > > I think going to bi-monthly is a great idea. It's great to see a > lot of content again! > >> I would rate my last issue of FoxTalk an F. And that's being charitable. >> I'm sad and pissed about the current state of FoxTalk. > > I wouldn't do business with that company solely on the basis of > their deceptive subscription practices. It's not like FoxTalk is the > only source of knowledge, and I strongly believe in not patronizing > businesses run by scum. > B****y hell, Ed, you must feel *very* strongly about this to use such uncharacteristically intemperate language ! [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
