Geoff, I'm sorry but I disagree with you, for a simple reason.
I am not at all convinced the *free* software is inferior to the *paid*
software.

In my business I used to detest the free software because I made nothing
when selling/installing it (apart from maybe my time)
But when I added up my time for all the problems with the *not free*
Kaspersky or Norton, I changed my mind.

I also think it is erroneous to compare AV software simply on the basis of
"how many virusses did it catch".

They should add criteria such as How much did it slow down your pc and How
often did it destroy/damage your dbf files or cdx files, and especially
this one, How often did it case file/record locking on the network.

Yes, my MS Essentials may let in an extra virus. (Not that it ever has) But
if it did, the time to kill/remove that virus far outweighs the
disadvantages of some of the others.




On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is a little amusing to hear people complaining about free software.
> Personally, I think that if you own a computer then you should own (and pay
> for) quality protection. You wouldn't buy a car and put third-rate free
> tyres on it (or you shouldn't at least). Buy quality anti-virus and stop
> complaining. One of the side-effects of the internet has been the belief
> that nobody should now pay for anything like software or movies etc but can
> reserve the right to complain about them.
>
> in this century, computer protection is essential so why do we think that
> protection should be free>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cag1nny-bron+3n+yeuzbcaz4aka_a31ypjtmqfcal1rfg7q...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to