On 17/05/14 11:46, [email protected] wrote:
[BIG SNIP]
Gary,
Output would be related to WRITING data; INPUT would be related to
READING data. I don't see how that's counter-intuitive? Obviously I'm
not understanding or missing the point. ???
Thanks,
--Mike
Sincere apologies, Mike. I didn't intentionally ignore you. Found your
message just now and realised it hadn't been answered.
Clearly we were looking at it from opposite directions. That's okay.
I think my view of the FILE function was that the convention would be to
name them according to the function performed by the FILE. On the other
hand, you're suggesting name them according to the current process, ie.
the operation of the program.
I'm happy to stick with my view of the world... but I won't fight you
over it. :-)
Stay well.
GaryT
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
