At 11:18 2014-07-08, Paul Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8 July 2014 17:07, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 02:58 2014-07-08, Laurie Alvey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> You might do better using the Scripting.FileSystemObject - it's easier
>> (IMHO) than arcane DOS commands.
> So let us see your code that is shorter than one line.
>
> DOS commands are not arcane; they have been around for over 30 years
> (which is long enough to learn them).
The for command is pretty powerful, I only know half of the syntax.
However, I don't think the current implementation has been around
for 30 years!
So it has been improved over 30 years. This is a surprise or a
reason to denigrate it?
I have used it for preparing a backup of an iteration that has
to include some subdirectories.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
