You and others have often suggested copying the database locally and seeing if the performance still suffers to rule out the network components. Are you able to try that? Sorry if I missed that post.

--Mike

On 2014-08-25 15:02, Ted Roche wrote:
Update: problem still there.

WAG KING's guess of swapping out workstations: the app shows the same
problems when she works at someone else's desk, so we're guessing it's not
hardware at the workstation end.

Rich thought networking, also one of my favorite things to blame, but Tech folks insist they are seeing no problems in the logs. (Yes, they might not
be looking at the right things, or know what to look for, but...)

Tracy's bloat theory looks deflated: we did a full pack, drop and reindex, and even a full DBC creation from script, no significant change in size.

We're reviewing the code to see if there might be something funny like
"create all the temp files on the network server and forget to close them" but we're talking about veteran experienced programmers and an app that's
running all over the country, just not this particular custom feature.

Will update if we learn anything...


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to