I solved a similar problem by realizing that items in stock and other such 
tables rarely get updated.  So I added a field called "Searchable" that 
contains the concatenation of all of the possibly searchable fields.  Yes, your 
file will be larger (though 10,000 record files aren't really very large to 
start with), and you'll take a one-time hit when you populate this field for 
all 10K records, but those drawbacks are negligible compared to the time you'll 
save by only having to search one field in the future.  Just don't forget to 
alter your insert and update routines to include populating the new field.

Mike

Michael H. Glassman
IS Manager
Pioneer Drama Service, Inc.
www.PioneerDrama.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: Sytze de Boer 
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 9:33 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Quickest Search


I have a large stock file (say 10,000 records)
I only have a vague idea what I'm searching for

So, I may have a variable like

srch4="upper(name+code+stkmemo+unitmeas2+altsupply+descopt2+descopt3+descopt4+descopt5+bar2code+bar3code+alt2code)"

Is there a better/quicker way to CONSTRUCT the following

Select Code, desc, price, cost, qoh from winstoks Into Table temp order By
Code where At(lcSearch,&srch4)>0

-- 
Kind regards,
Sytze de Boer
Kiss Software

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/B4C296C1E9194A118F633B4ACCB18EEB@Studio17
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to