(NapTime) I did some research on this...after all, this vital detail was somehow missed by all the Hacker's Guide books...
I didn't find any reference to NapTime in FPW 2.6 or prior versions. I don't have VFP 3 but there are mentions of "NapTime" in VFP 5 and beyond. There's a mention as a reserved word and a reference in the Wizards directory. From VFP 5 and beyond, this should work: USE HOME(1) + [Wizards\FdKeyWrd.DBF] BROWSE FOR [NAPTIME] $ UPPER(Token) ...and there it is. The Code field is used to indicate it's a property. So it's a reserved word because it's a property. Run the Beautify on code that references a Naptime property and Beautify will change the casing to your Beautify selection. I'm pretty certain this table is used by the Beautify process. In VFP, the Beautify.APP appears to be more of a loader application while in FPW the .APP does more (just look inside). However, there is zero indication that "NapTime" is an actual reserved word. It's marked in the help file as such...but I haven't been able to find a conflict by creating an object and adding a property called "NapTime". Since this didn't exist before VFP and the "NapTime" reference existed in VFP 5, my suspicion is that at one time this was a property of a Timer object, only the property was changed to "Interval" but the documentation didn't get completly cleaned up. Again, this is entirely conjecture on my part. The timeline is consistent though, the Timer object didn't exist before VFP. Anyone still have VFP3 loaded? Hey Ed, you have a VFP4 CD, you wanna load it and check for the Timer.Naptime property?? OK, I suspect you have bigger fish to fry. By the way, you guys know that VF5 introduced the _Netware, _SQLServer and _Oracle properties? These were introduced in the beta and carried around ever since. Try ?_Oracle in the command window and you won't generate an error. Bill Anderson On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:39 AM, <[email protected] > wrote: > On 2014-09-04 04:00, Alan Bourke wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, at 04:25 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >> (BTW, according to the help, "naptime" is a reserved word. A >>> search shows it occurs only in the reserved word list. What gives?) >>> >> >> >> Ha, so it is! That's weird. >> > > > I would have lost money on that bet!!!! > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CA+O1enEk166YBpfthDMvoTEsbzD63KPFhOhps7HFoA18kF=r...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
