On Oct 8, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: >> It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy Framework: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework > > I've done that several times; it seems that Gmail occasionally changes what's > required. I'll look into it.
Well, it's not an SPF issue, as the logs show a lot of mail to gmail accounts going through just fine. Here's a typical line from the log for a rejected email: Oct 9 12:17:09 mail postfix/smtp[24231]: C99BE180AD: to=<[email protected]>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4003:c07::1a]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.09/1.1/0.14/0.83, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4003:c07::1a] said: 550-5.7.1 [2001:4800:780e:510:5a7c:29d4:ff04:5000 12] Our system has 550-5.7.1 detected that this message is likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the 550-5.7.1 amount of spam sent to Gmail, this message has been blocked. Please 550-5.7.1 visit 550-5.7.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=188131 for 550 5.7.1 more information. q82si1825923oib.138 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command)) I'll follow up later with some of their suggestions for reducing the number of messages that they classify as spam. In the meantime, feel free to re-activate your account if you get automatically suspended for too many bounces. -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/pgp-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
