Interesting, I was just thinking that I haven't received one of these,

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Oct 8, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy Framework:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
> >
> > I've done that several times; it seems that Gmail occasionally changes
> what's required. I'll look into it.
>
> Well, it's not an SPF issue, as the logs show a lot of mail to gmail
> accounts going through just fine. Here's a typical line from the log for a
> rejected email:
>
> Oct  9 12:17:09 mail postfix/smtp[24231]: C99BE180AD: to=<
> [email protected]>, 
> relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4003:c07::1a]:25,
> delay=2.1, delays=0.09/1.1/0.14/0.83, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4003:c07::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
> [2001:4800:780e:510:5a7c:29d4:ff04:5000      12] Our system has 550-5.7.1
> detected that this message is likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the
> 550-5.7.1 amount of spam sent to Gmail, this message has been blocked.
> Please 550-5.7.1 visit 550-5.7.1
> http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=188131 for 550
> 5.7.1 more information. q82si1825923oib.138 - gsmtp (in reply to end of
> DATA command))
>
> I'll follow up later with some of their suggestions for reducing the
> number of messages that they classify as spam. In the meantime, feel free
> to re-activate your account if you get automatically suspended for too many
> bounces.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/signed
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   application/pgp-signature
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capuy6voz3n_eyvp64oz8x1_23rzpccpw5wtjmh_y9xgek8i...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to