That's right Dave, I didn't answered before because I've not registered on
Leafe, but Iv'e registered 2 days ago just to answer.

It's a pitty that some people keep using XML for comparing VFP code, or any
aother text representation that is not actually code, but I think this is
just because they have accostumed to what where available for many years
and they don't know other new options.

In last SouthwestFox 2014 Rick Schummer made a session talking about it
<http://www.swfox.net/2014/sessionsswfox.aspx#VFPXEdition2014_1>, and there
where some talks and posts on Universal Thread, Foxite, fox.wikis, and
Google Groups.

If there is something not clear enough in the VFPx Docs, you can contact me
on VFPx forums, Thor forums, UT, Foxite or in this list.

I suggest reading the Log of changes on VFPx (on main FoxBin2Prg download
page <https://vfpx.codeplex.com/releases/view/116407>), because there are
new useful things in the Preview-1 of the next v1.19.43 release that could
be useful to you,  like the new "RemoveZOrderSetFromProps" option proposed
by Ryan Harris, or the "UseClassPerFile" implemented in latest versions
(this class separation by file was an idea taken from TwoFox).

In the past I've collaborated in some parts of the coding of ScctextX at
VFPx, so I've incorporated to FoxBin2Prg all the great ideas used in
SccTextX nad TwoFox, which I've used too.

I know you are going to enjoy it, merging with VFP 9 is great right now :)

Best regards!


2015-04-27 11:24 GMT+02:00 Dave Crozier <[email protected]>:

> Thank you for the link Fernando... I think this will be most useful as we
> are just beginning our migration to full source control. In fact I think it
> was myself that opened the thread you talked about.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando D.
> Bozzo
> Sent: 25 April 2015 15:59
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Source Code Version Control
>
> Hi:
>
> I've read this thread <http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498154> late
> (same title, 2 months ago), but hope not too late.
>
> >From time to time I read that some people keep using old tools which
> >can
> not take advantage of old or modern SCM/DVCS tools.
>
> In this case, I see that some people keep using TwoFox for converting
> tables to XML (I've used it back in 2009), and I ask myself why having
> tools that can convert VFP 9 binaries to prg-style programs, can someone
> stay with XMLs, that have nothing to do with VFP programming or VFP code.
>
> I think that this is just a problem of don't knowing the available
> options, and to bring some help on the matter I want you to know that from
> the end of 2013 there is a new tool that replace SccText/X and TwoFox,
> called FoxBin2Prg and hosted on VFPx:
>
> https://vfpx.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=FoxBin2Prg
>
> There is documentation available on the link I've provided to explain and
> show why you should be using it. As far I can tell, this is the only tool
> that can convert forms, classes, menus, reports, labels, tables and
> databases to text, allowing their modification, and regenerate the binaries
> again.
>
> This means that you can not only Diff, but Merge text files viewing them
> as if you coded in prgs.
>
> Right now there are people using this two-way conversion tool with
> SourceSafe, git, PlasticSCM and some others, and in the last version
> (thanks to people advice and ideas), there is an enhanced API that allow
> you make your own processes.
>
> Hope you can take a look and find it useful,
>
> Fernando D. Bozzo
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_Ju=jwxfnk_5DYU7q88B1wdrVtAe=msfpjltetbyztem...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to