Are there any programs which will print the information found in these tables? We are converting them to VB.NET and I would rather not write the program if it already exists. Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc. Crescent Lake Plaza 5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd. Waterford, MI 48327 (248) 683-4182 www.visual-foxpro-programmer.com www.erw.com [email protected] From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 4:17 AM Subject: ProFox Digest, Vol 142, Issue 16 ----- Forwarded Message -----
Send ProFox mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ProFox digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Inspect Returned Object (Tracy Pearson) 2. Re: Inspect Returned Object - Yep please ignore (Jeff Johnson) 3. Re: John Koziol (Pete Theisen) 4. Re: John Koziol (jeff) 5. How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Ted Roche) 6. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Virgil Bierschwale) 7. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Tracy Pearson) 8. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Ken Dibble) 9. RE: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Virgil Bierschwale) 10. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Ted Roche) 11. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Ted Roche) 12. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Jeff Johnson) 13. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Ken McGinnis) 14. Re: How to tell clients which "Windows" devices VFP runs on (Alan Bourke) On February 14, 2015 1:45:40 PM EST, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2/14/2015 9:14 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: >> >> On February 14, 2015 11:07:43 AM EST, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> >wrote: >>> Excuse my inexperience but when I call a web service I get an >object. >>> Let's say "o". I downloaded XML Notepad. How do I view "o"? is it >a >>> file on my system? Is it in memory? How do I view it in XML >Notepad? >>> >>> A little help with this would be greatly appreciated. >>> >> O.xml will hold the plain xml you call put on the clipboard or save >to a file. >> >> I'm going to grab my laptop and get an example. >> >> Also, o should have the search abilities I mentioned earlier as well. >If o.xml does not contain xml what's up? o.xml is not defined for this > >object. I know for a fact that it is xml. This message came after the thank you showing the example. Is there still trouble? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. On 2/14/2015 1:50 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > > On February 14, 2015 1:45:40 PM EST, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2/14/2015 9:14 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: >>> On February 14, 2015 11:07:43 AM EST, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Excuse my inexperience but when I call a web service I get an >> object. >>>> Let's say "o". I downloaded XML Notepad. How do I view "o"? is it >> a >>>> file on my system? Is it in memory? How do I view it in XML >> Notepad? >>>> A little help with this would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>> O.xml will hold the plain xml you call put on the clipboard or save >> to a file. >>> I'm going to grab my laptop and get an example. >>> >>> Also, o should have the search abilities I mentioned earlier as well. >> If o.xml does not contain xml what's up? o.xml is not defined for this >> >> object. I know for a fact that it is xml. > This message came after the thank you showing the example. Is there still > trouble? -- Jeff Jeff Johnson [email protected] SanDC, Inc. (623) 582-0323 SMS (602) 717-5476 Fax 623-869-0675 www.san-dc.com www.cremationtracker.com www.agentrelationshipmanager.com On 02/14/2015 09:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Pete: John was a member of the Fox team at Microsoft. He was a tester > and them moved to lead tester. The name rang a bell, must have been one of the other ones I met somewhere. > > On 2/13/2015 11:34 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: >> On 02/13/2015 08:14 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> Can someone please provide me with John's email address. It is >>> important to me. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> >> Hi Jeff, >> >> Not to be smart, but is he any of these guys? >> >> https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=John+Koziol&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 >> >> > -- Regards, Pete https://www.facebook.com/pete.theisen.5 No worries, Pete. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: Pete Theisen <[email protected]> Date:02/14/2015 16:52 (GMT-07:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: John Koziol On 02/14/2015 09:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Pete: John was a member of the Fox team at Microsoft. He was a tester > and them moved to lead tester. The name rang a bell, must have been one of the other ones I met somewhere. > > On 2/13/2015 11:34 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: >> On 02/13/2015 08:14 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> Can someone please provide me with John's email address. It is >>> important to me. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> >> Hi Jeff, >> >> Not to be smart, but is he any of these guys? >> >> https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=John+Koziol&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 >> >> > -- Regards, Pete https://www.facebook.com/pete.theisen.5 [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
