On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 13:59 2015-06-11, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > here are a few of us. I have programs and utilities running >> > under DOSBox, because Microsoft likes breaking things. Either that, >> > or they are incompetent about keeping running things running. >> >> You can take almost any 16-bit MS-DOS application of any vintage and run >> it under 32-bit Windows 10. Microsoft take backwards-compatibility >> seriously almost to a fault compared with Apple and the Linux distros. >> Every OS moves/changes things with major releases. >> > > But not with 64-bit. > > Guess what came on my laptop. And it was the Home edition so XP Mode > would not run on it. Microsoft made XP Mode so it will not run on > non-Premium versions. Why did they do that? It appears they skipped the > backwards-compatibility and went straight to the fault. > ------------- As a professional you chose to use the home version. I think the fault lies with you. That is the most striped down in features correct? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyl9k7p2-rrvqctxnqcqpnwva0aynvzcy4vk522pcfs...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
