Thanks Tracy.
We didn't want to click on anything - it appeared to be all too suspicious.

It's late now (2.30am) and I'm on matchsticks for eye lid support.
Will play with it when the head is fresher in the morning.

Greatly appreciate your input.
GT



On 23/06/15 22:45, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Hi Gary,

Following a link may validate the email address. So I headed over to the Bing 
privacy statement. 
http://www.microsoft.com/privacystatement/en-us/bingandmsn/default.aspx

It doesn't mention Xbox or Skype directly. It was updated in March. That is 
here in the U.S.. Do some investigation to see if it different for your country 
of origin.

HTH,
Tracy

On June 23, 2015 1:57:43 AM EDT, GaryT <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey guys,

Does anyone recognise the message below, or any aspect of it?

I'm part of a large group and several people have already reported
receiving it. So, it could have gone literally to thousands.

Most suspicions arise from the email address
        <[email protected]>

and the weird URLs
http://microsoft.microsoft.com/Key-4660701.C.CmDvX.C.K2.-.HdtT07

and the range of items
        Updating the Services Agreement    (singular??)
        Privacy URL
        Services Agreement URL
        Frequently Asked Questions URL

On this list we know some Microsoft people. I'm hoping it's possible
that someone is able to clear it, or to can it as junk mail.

Much appreciated
GaryT


--
...
Gary Taig
[email protected]
ph:   03 9700 1566
Mob:  04 1122 1190






_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to