Nope, until about a year ago, we had several VFP apps that did read/write to FPD2.6 tables with no issues. Now the goal is to replace the tables with some flavor of SQL.
Fred On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Kevin Cully <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought that VFP wouldn't modify a table if was just 'reading' data, but > if it wrote to a FP2.6 table that it'd modify the header in some way that > it would make it incompatible with FP2.6 from that point on. I may not be > recalling this properly though. > > CULLY Technologies, LLC > http://cullytechnologies.com > http://cully.biz > > On 07/15/2015 04:54 PM, Fred Taylor wrote: > >> VFP does NOT change a 2.6 table in any way. You just have to be sure that >> any table you create in VFP that needs to be accessed 2.6 uses COPY TO >> table26 TYPE FOX2X >> >> Fred >> >> > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJCBksreen4a4Xg608DtOWMrXoreDWArgqU0B5hxbmjXv=9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
