On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kevin Cully <[email protected]> wrote: > Confirmed! I wrote a test sample in VFP9 that inserted 100 records into a > FPW table. I then was able to open the FPW table in FPW2.6 and append > another record without issue. Thank you to everyone for their help.
It's exclusive use you want to be really careful with. Worth testing, but iirc, things like packing and reindexing (essentially, anything that re-writes the DBF file header other than incrementing record count and LUPDATE()) are candidates for turning FPW files into VFP files. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4szfw530yjndhvrwut34gwehasdi4rf-dbkj3bznut...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
