MS has blown that off as of now.

I have an issue on getting a SharePoint 2013 SSRS report to actually
print.  I have a document made that identifies all of the components that
might be out of spec and how in my situation all are to the reported spec.


It is frigging complicated that the report will render but the printer icon
won't render to allow someone to print it.

We have this as a bug reporting to M$ currently.  Company has unused
consulting $ in our annual contract and it renews after Feb. Maybe we can
get a better story from the horse mouth because too many times web searches
have ending statements like Still doesn't work and no more posts from M$.

Need to kill some time?  Install SharePoint and attempt to round up cats as
a "better way to collaborate" at work.   I have document management issues
that need a solution to implement in SP.  Too many need to be annually
updated and re-certified that a custom app is on the horizon to do this.
In the end the app will post the final copy to the correct plan site out of
20 different ones we have.  Oh yeah the joy is sometimes the document needs
to sent to multiple locations as well.




On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]>
wrote:

> At 06:40 2016-02-23, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There are no technical reasons why I shouldn't
> > >have been allowed to continue to run Office 97 on Windows 7
>
> Endless backward compatibility is unrealistic and there is a point where
> providing some aspect of it costs a company more than it's worth in user
> retention. Should Microsoft or anyone else really have to deal with all
> the heartache of enabling and supporting 16-bit software on a 64-bit OS
> at this point in time, especially when there are solutions like
> virtualisation and containers? Windows does a better job than almost
> anything bar certain big-iron mainframe operating systems in this
> respect.
>
>
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLOztJb7+J77_u5YPXt076q9j00R95pMki+Ur=-s9j...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to