Anyone that took my statement seriously is a few bricks short of a full load. I certainly would not go through with my challenge, if anyone were clueless enough to respond to it.
The intent of my statement was to get folks thinking about how hypocritical it is to attack diesel emissions, when the gasoline cars and trucks they drive are far more damaging to the environment than light diesel car and truck emissions, and its curious that the EPA never seemed to complain much about the big 18 wheeler diesel emissions, as the 18 wheelers crisscross the country providing the crux of the US system of distribution of almost all products. Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: >On Wednesday 15 November 2006 21:37, Leland Jackson wrote: > >Hi Leland! > >If someone were to answer your challenge would he/she not die? You cannot know >who might do it. This is crossing the line even for you. Last man standing >indeed. > > > >>Your usual hogwash: >> >> ><snip> > > >>>Hi Leland! >>> >>>If this is not hatred I have no idea what hatred is. You wish death to >>>anyone who doesn't know enough to decline your challenge. No wonder you >>>are on the terrorist's side. >>> >>> ><snip> > > >>>>I will stay in my grange with a diesel engine running if you stay in your >>>>grange with a gasoline engine running, and the last man standing wins. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
