When I am called in to audit/rescue a project, one of the items on my checklist is to attempt to recreate the project by adding the main program to a new PJX and Build All. Nearly every project I have ever worked on failed this step because it missed an EXTERNAL PROCEDURE call or a programmatically-created resource within the project.
It is an excellent exercise to confirm your project CAN be rebuilt, but it's not a good way to rename a project. On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:24 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > If you wanted to rename a project, would you create a new PJX with the > right/desired name, or would you just rename the existing PJX/PJT? Just > curious. > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4tcyegz1eapbpag6znolm76nphntyaozbglkx-hew5...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
