On 2016-11-03 11:16, Ted Roche wrote:
When I am called in to audit/rescue a project, one of the items on my
checklist is to attempt to recreate the project by adding the main
program to a new PJX and Build All. Nearly every project I have ever
worked on failed this step because it missed an EXTERNAL PROCEDURE
call or a programmatically-created resource within the project.
It is an excellent exercise to confirm your project CAN be rebuilt,
but it's not a good way to rename a project.
I just didn't like the initial project name. Now that I'm ready to
deliver to end-user, I wanted to change the name to a better one. I
know that I can change the name when building the EXE, but I've never
liked that idea...always wondered why somebody would want to do that. I
know if there was a problem reported in MyApp.EXE, I'd like to search
for project MyApp. If the EXE was named something different than the
project, that might cause confusion and delay, not to mention cursing.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
