At 12:56 2017-06-08, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that
> are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are not
> great but are horrid.
I suspect we have all seen tens of thousands of web pages, most
mediocre or worse, while we've probably only seen hundreds of Windows
and DOS data entry screens, most mediocre or worse.
Whoa! Mediocre is one thing. Uninspired still does the
job. It is the "or worse" that gets me. How people figure that a
Webpage or app should be like that is beyond me.
UX is hard.
No, UX is fairly easy at a basic level.
I can deal with an uninspired Webpage or app.
Inspired UX is can be very hard indeed. I appreciate when I see it.
I do not complain much about uninspired, but I detest horrid.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b8d1dcf805bd0c6bfc7aca4068b510b9@mtlp000086
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
