Chris How many client PCs connecting?
How many using it via RDP sessions? Are the RDP sessions similarly slow? -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, at 10:45 AM, Chris Davis wrote: > Thanks for the replies, yes we used to disable SMB2 to remove the index > corruption issue but this now seems to be a performance issue. > > This particular scenario is 2 brand new Server 2012 boxes, fully patched. > One is the server and one is a remote desktop box. So far nothing has > been messed with or tweaked. > > An application which used to run fine on the older servers now runs a lot > slower, the application in question is Pegasus Opera 3 which I know some > of you are familiar with. > > Thanks > > Chris. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan > Bourke > Sent: 22 June 2017 10:37 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VFP & Server 2012 > > There was an issue with SMB2 in the early days of Server 2008, which was > subsequently fixed by MS and before the fix the workaround was to knock > it back to SMB1. Ever since it was fixed we have not had to touch > anything to do with these types of networking settings in the normal > course of events. These days you definitely want everything running at > SMB2 or SMB3 (as negotiated automatically between clients and the > server) or it you'll definitely see sub-optimal speed. > > > > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, at 10:25 AM, Chris Davis wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I have read through previous posts on this subject, but the more I > > read the more confused I get as to what advice I should be following. > > > > We have a situation where speed issues are affecting a VFP application. > > The data is held on a Server 2012 server. Previously we have be told to > > disable SMB2 etc, but it seems now that this shouldn't be an issue. > > > > I have now found mentions of a SMB2 registry setting along the lines > > of the OPLOCKS thing years ago. This setting is DisableLeasing, has > > anyone else faced similar issues and/or used this DisableLeasing > > option to improve application performance? > > > > Thanks > > > > Chris. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1498127320.2155615.1017702984.54a56...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
