On 2018-04-05 13:19, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
At 12:43 2018-04-04, [email protected] wrote:
VFP9
I don't see why folks would use Numeric(X,0) where X > 4 instead of an
Integer field. Can you tell me why? I'm guessing it's leftover
legacy design?
There are a couple that I can think of:
1) Often, the numbers that I am dealing with are defined by number
of digits. For example, my app has work order numbers of up to
999999. "N(6)" covers that nicely and even documents it.
2) The column width in a browse for a column defined as N(?) will be
just right (assuming the caption is not too wide). If I declare the
column as integer, it will be wider than necesssary.
Interesting...thanks, Gene!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
