On 8/20/2019 11:15 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
The initial request said that there was a plan already defined.
After running my app (VFP 9) on our local network (with a DBC) for many
years, we are upgrading it (in stages) to a visual studio app with SQL
server back end.
I would only work in promoting future ways of doing things in this case.
Resistance to the change could lead to termination from the team in all
honesty as they make progress. Finding replacement VFP work today is not
as easy as it used to be.
Well certainly do whatever to not get fired, of course! But my point
was that the CAs appear to be much more flexible if you're going to be
doing any VFP work with an eye on the future with respect to using
non-VFP databases in the future. That's all.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
