Hal Kaplan wrote: > Ricardo wrote ... > > => if 'NO ONE is above' then you in particular are 'not above'. > => So who should he believe? His friend who's an expert and is > => IN THE FIELD removing them? Or you, talking about a subject > => you know nothing about (and I don't mean bombs but what's > => going on in Lebanon). > > And you, in particular, as well. Do you know this "friend"? Do you have > first-hand knowledge of his "expertise"? Can you document it? >
No, I don't know his friend. That's why I had no opinion on the subject. My intervention referred exclusively to what was written in the forum and not about the bombs, or any of the participants character. > You, sir, (you are a man, right?) are as guilty as the rest of us! To which > I say, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." I am guilty. Very guilty. Just not of what you are suggesting. > > That is strange because in Spanish "sin" means "without." So how would that > translate? That would translate : 'El que esté libre de pecado que tire la primera piedra' And what about 'Thou shalt not kill'? Does it enumerate any exceptions? Should you cite a book you don't believe in? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
