George, AVG here with no problems and the latest V7.5 uses less CPU resources then the older version. Another alternative is AVAST which has equally good writeups.
As they say, MAPI and Symantec ---> BAD!!! Dave Crozier -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing Sent: 04 December 2006 11:59 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: An Alternative to Norton ... Suggestions Please Allen wrote: > I use AVG > We also use AVG here and mostly it has been great. There has been the odd virus not detected but they are very rare. You have to be careful with the scheduled scans when installing as it can try to scan the whole machine every morning when it is turned on. Users then complain about the machine running slow. We try to have them scan once a week (monday at 17:55) and ask the user to leave the machine on. Peter [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
