With the SVNSCC from PushOK it is properly handling the pjm and updating the
project correctly. I DO NEED to unlock the PJM after VFP locks it, otherwise
the other developers will not be able to access it. Leave it readwrite on
the local box and unlocked in source control. I have seen doing a "Clean up"
with the svn command line or TortoiseSVN puts the pjm back to readonly, and
VFP needs to Lock it again.

Even with SourceSafe integration the PJX and PJT are not stored in source
control, only the PJM. SourceSafe has a setting to allow multiple checkouts
which allows for this pjm sharing, without that minor step.

The project hook I think is a VFP bug, not a SCC provider issue.

Tracy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin O'Shea
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:10 PM
>
> Can't really help you on your question as we don't store the
> project files (pjt and pjx) or the pjm file in CVS. We use
> PushOK as well, but we weren't sure on the best approach to
> storing the project files in Source Control.
>
> I understood that we should be able to store the pjm file
> only in Source Control and that this file would be updated as
> developers made changes to the project and other developers
> could get the latest copy when joining a project, or the
> updated pjm at any time.
>
> We ran into problems with this approach, as PushOK did not
> bring down the updated pjm file and merge it into other
> developer's local project.
>
> For a work-around, we have just verbally let everyone know to
> get a new form (for example) when a new form is added to the project.
>
> How have you went about handling this - do you just store the
> pjm file in source control?
>
> Kevin O'Shea




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to