=> Subject: Inventory suggestions
=> 
=> I am tasked with taking an inventory system that is 
=> currently being done in Lotus and porting the functionality 
=> over to a VFP app. Are there any Inventory Gurus out there 
=> that could offer any advise on what is the best way to 
=> implement this? ( it is an inventory of raw materials)
=> 
=> Pointing me in the direction of any reading material would 
=> be helpful also.
=> 

If you really mean "porting," then it would seem that all the requirements and 
restrictions and other operating considerations are going to remain as is.  
Perhaps I am playing with semantics but in my mind you don't have much 
flexibility or opportunity for significant improvement.

OTOH, if "porting" means something else to you (i.e. rewriting the app) then 
there are probably business reasons that have influenced the decision.  Is the 
app too slow, too limited, lacking in capacity, etc.?  So tell us what the 
problems are.

Inventory, in its simplest form, is keeping track of what you have and how much 
you have on hand.  Then you move into other things like replenishment levels, 
vendors, prices, etc.  Where do you fit on this pyramid of functionality?  At 
the top where you are doing only one thing, or at the bottom where you are 
doing everything imaginable?

A big problem with inventory is nomenclature.  If you do not have a well-formed 
taxonomy and a method for insuring adherence to it, you will eventually have 
somebody holding 30 gizmos and someone else holding 50 widgets when in reality 
the company holds 80 whatsits.

OK ... now back to you Eugene.  Tell us some more.

B+
HALinNY


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to