john harvey wrote: > So what are you trying to say? Don't you use "joinerfields" like the rest > of us. I've incorporated them into my latest version of the dwim() and > intended() functions, which are really now what used to be called classes. I > have renamed them classlesses.<VBG>
P.S. My attorney will be filing a claim regardless your use of my classlesses invention, too. I have a piece of paper, done right with type-writing and carbon paper and everything, from the Patent Office recognizing my invention. A whompin' big ol' claim, yessirree bob. Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
