But, it's exactly the same as Galileo, because he went against "group think" which is what you have here, and not even ALL scientists agree. It's just those on the left side of center.
John -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:45 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying GlobalWarmingSkeptics On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:38 PM, john harvey wrote: > Or put another way, if they don't toe the mark, they will be > ousted! Didn't > Galileo have a small problem like that? Except that the mark in this case is the standard scientific peer review process. In Galileo's case, and in what you're trying to imply, it was because he reached a conclusion that differed from the non-scientific, religious-based world view. This is exactly the opposite of that: people who want to call themselves 'scientists', but who subjugate the scientific method to their belief system. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
