Charlie Coleman <> wrote:
> At 06:39 AM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> ...
>> We Catholics have a great advantage in life. We can do whatever so
>> long as we go to church on sunday and confess. I think other
>> Christians were not granted the privilege ;c)
> ...
> 
> Ah. This might be where I'm having problems making myself clear.
> 
> Being Catholic does not mean you are a Christian. Mormons claim to be
> Christians, Christian Scientists claim to be Christian, and Jehovah's
> Witnesses claim to be Christian. I don't believe those religions
> teach true Christianity. There may well be Christians that are
> members of these religions, but the religion itself does not
> accurately reflect Christian beliefs in my opinion.     
> 
> I've said it before: the one group of people that has done the most
> good in advancing the message of the Gospel is Catholics; the one
> group that has done the most damage to the message of the Gospel is
> the Catholics.   
> 
> I haven't studied the early history of the Catholic Church very
> closely, but somewhere along the line it morphed into pretty much
> what Jesus condemned. The 'legalistic' concepts of Catholicism are
> exactly what Jesus faced and rejected while he was on Earth (at that
> time it was the Jewish 'legalism' which he tore apart). You may have
> been joking, but from what I've seen a lot of Catholics believe
> exactly what you said: "I'll be OK as long as I get to Church Sunday
> and confess." Nothing could be further from the truth. Relying on
> "works", especially "tally" type things (I can make up for 2 bad
> things by doing 3 good ones), is not what Jesus taught. Yet this is
> what Catholicism still puts forth (from what I've seen - but it's
> interesting to note that some Catholic Churches I've attended in the
> US in the past few years seem to actually be getting back to God's
> Grace as the source of salvation).             
> 
> The whole "works" thing is where I think Catholicsm has done the most
> damage to Christianity. By focusing so much on deeds as the means to
> salvation, Catholicsm pretty much makes Christianity sound like just
> any other religion. E.g. do x, then y, then z, give money, yada yada,
> and your soul will go to heaven. But that's the fallacy of all
> non-Christian religions. Most of them make it seem that the person
> can control their own salvation. If they work hard enough, if they
> fast long enough, if they remember to bow down the right number of
> times, etc. But Christianity is first and foremost about how man is
> totally helpless to change his relation with God. It took an act of
> God to provide the way for man's salvation. To accept that is
> ultimately humbling which is why so many have a hard time with it.
> Mankind has this "pride" aspect where we think we know it all, or can
> know it all, and that we can take care of it ourselves.             

Did anyone feel the earth quake?  Charlie and I agree.  

It's the personal relationship with god that creates the Christian, and not
the ceremony of attending gatherings.




Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
    can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/648 - Release Date: 1/23/2007
11:04 AM
 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to