Ed Leafe wrote: > http://www.anonymousliberal.com/2007/01/gops-pied-piper-problem.html > ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yrt2dw ) > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > For the last decade and a half, the Republican party has pursued an > intentional strategy of insulating its base from reality. The goal > has been to create a permanent block of loyal Republican voters who > will dutifully internalize whatever the party's leaders tell them. > > To accomplish this, the Republican political machine has engaged in a > relentless and systematic assault on all of the institutions in our > society that have traditionally served as arbiters of truth. They > have attacked the press, the judiciary, academia, and even science > itself. And they've been remarkably successful; we've now reached a > point where much of the Republican base simply refuses to believe > anything that doesn't come from a trusted partisan outlet. > > Any unpleasant news reports can be dismissed as the product of > liberal media bias. Any inconvenient studies can be explained away as > the work of godless academic elitists. And any adverse court rulings > can be chalked up to liberal judicial activism. In short, if it > didn't come from the mouth of Rush Limbaugh or the President himself, > it's automatically suspect. > [snip] > This strategy has an inherent vulnerability, though. Call it the Pied > Piper problem. If you train a bunch of people to follow the Leader > reflexively, they're likely to follow him right out of town (or right > off a cliff). > > This is the problem now confronting all sane members of the > Republican party. For years now, they've been telling the American > people--among other things--that everything in Iraq is going fine, > that the liberal media is just refusing to report the good news, and > that any criticism of the war or the President's war policy gives aid > and comfort to the enemy. The vast majority of the American people > have long since tuned this message out, but not the Republican base. > President Bush may only have a 28% approval rating, but those 28% > represent the true-believers. And those are the voters who are going > to decide who the next Republican presidential nominee will be. > > That puts Republicans in a terrible bind. If they acknowledge > reality, which they'll need to do in order to have any hope of > winning independent and moderate voters, they may well be branded as > traitors by their base, who still firmly support the Leader and his > Glorious War. > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MMMmmmm....nope. Stupid is stupid. They'll take whatever their leaders feed them, no matter how stupid, and keep voting them. I agree with Robert Heinlein, you're headed for a religious dictatorship more sooner than later. What really concerns us, the rest of the world, is the WMDs such an irresponsible country has been hiding. Should we invade USA in order to get rid of the irresponsible dictator and "free" the citizens from this religious fundamentalist? Should we then stay there for some long time in order to make sure the newly elected govt. can keep the peace? Should we also invade Canada, who is providing the rebellious terrorists with guns and explosives? Well, we'll cross those bridges in due time (in about 5 to 10 yrs?). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
