> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bill Arnold > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 1:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Lack of Written Specifications > > > Jeff, how about including something like: > > "concurrent with ongoing product support, a separate task will be > assigned to develop written specifications based on the existing > application and requirements for future development", and maybe show an > example of specs prepared for another project to serve as a model. > > > > Bill > >
Bill: That would be a good idea if this were a customer that had an existing app; kind of like the thread earlier this week regarding someone else's work. In this case it is two software developers. They are not going to pay me to document specifications, nor are they going to do it themselves. There is, however, a user manual for the ultimate user of the application, but that is not a substitute for technical specifications. We use Source Safe, so not only is the baseline version cast in stone; any modifications are also. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
