Below is an except form part two of the article "The Deep Politics of
God: The CNP, Dominionism, and the Ted Haggard Scandal". Evangelicals
and Dominionists are closely aligned with, and I believe controlled by
Neoconservative and the Bush Administration. To make matters worse the
Evangleicals are beginning to embrace and merge with the Dominionists.
The Dominionists want to kind of make a utopia heaven right here on
earth by way of a violent reformation. The long term plan is to amass a
1 billion man army world wide which would carry out the reformation and
establish a new world wide Dominionist's society, which of course would
include an overthrow of the US Constitutional form of Government. If
only God's elect, as defined by the Dominionist, were to survive the
reformation, then billions of people would perish.
The planned Dominionist reformation plays right into the hands of the
Neoconservative who are also hungry for power and a new form of
government in the US. This sure seems like these organizations are
subversive, but since the Bush Administration and the Neocons are
playing the Religious Righters, they would do everything in their power
to foster the movement, rather than hinder it by making Dominionists
member of a subversive organization. We need political leadership that
would keep a close eye on the development of Dominionism and classify it
as a subversive organization, just like Communism was classified as a
subversive organization. In this way the movement could be stopped or
crippled before it becomes to powerful.
Don't underestimate the CNP, (eg Council for National Policy), which is
a secretive organization of Evangelicals, Dominionists, and other
Christian leadership from around the country. I doubt you will ever see
the instigators of the war with Iraq brought to justice, as long as the
Bush Administration and his Neoconservative appointees occupy the White
House and control the Religious Righters.
#----------------------------------------------
Several neoconservative ideologues have espoused socialist ideas. Former
neoconservative Michael Lind admits:
The fact that most of the younger neocons were never on the left is
irrelevant; they are the intellectual (and, in the case of William
Kristol and John Podhoretz, the literal) heirs of older ex-leftists.
The idea that the United States and similar societies are dominated
by a decadent, postbourgeois "new class" was developed by thinkers
in the Trotskyist tradition like James Burnham and Max Schachtman,
who influenced an older generation of neocons. The concept of the
"global democratic revolution" has its origins in the Trotskyist
Fourth International's vision of permanent revolution. The economic
determinist idea that liberal democracy is an epiphenomenon of
capitalism, promoted by neocons like Michael Novak, is simply
Marxism with entrepreneurs substituted for proletarians as the
heroic subjects of history. (No pagination)
Neoconservativism, which has been embraced by the controlled Evangelical
movement, is actually a creature of the political left. It is truly
ironic that secular progressives would condemn their pseudo-Christian
opponents for these dubious associations. If secular progressives are
genuinely disturbed by the political system that the CNP, the
Dominionists, and the Evangelical establishment are creating, then they
must seriously question their own vision for society. Both sides are
merely variants of the same neo-Gnostic vision and strive to immanentize
the Eschaton. Both sides are merely variants of sociopolitical Darwinism
and view global government as the unavoidable outcome of man's alleged
developmental ascent. This is a vintage Hegelian dialectic. The only
difference is the name of the patron deity exalted by both sides. The
god of secular progressives is man himself, enthroned to rule over a
technocratic Utopia. The god of the Dominionists is a deistic Christ who
proffers the neo-Gnostic mandate for a worldly kingdom sustained through
worldly power.
Evidently, the culture war has provided fertile soil for the power
elite's Hegelian activism. The combatants in this dialectical struggle
are merely fellow travelers on convergent paths toward a Hegelian
synthesis. That synthesis is already underway, as is evidenced by the
political ties being forged between leftist evangelicals and
Dominionists. One example of this alliance is the recent "meeting of the
minds" between Presidential hopeful Barack Obama and Dominionist,
Mega-Church pastor Rick Warren. The pretext for their partnership seems
to be AIDS awareness and prevention. After all, Warren invited Obama to
a two-day AIDS summit held at his church (Donovan, no pagination). As
cynical as it may sound, AIDS may be the last thing on Obama's mind when
it comes to his coalition with Warren. Democrats have come to appreciate
how important it is to have a few Dominionists in their pockets if they
want to seize this country's sizeable Christian vote. Warren's teachings
are pure Dominionism. Sarah Leslie provides an examination into the
Dominionist elements of Warren's global P.E.A.C.E. plan:
Warren has audaciously called for a "Second Reformation" based upon
his global P.E.A.C.E. Plan, which is a study in dominionism.
Leftists who fret over Warren's foray into AIDS may miss the more
serious dominionist ramifications of his overall global plan. Warren
intends to amass the world's largest volunteer "army" of "one
billion foot soldiers" to implement his global P.E.A.C.E. Plan. (No
pagination)
It is very interesting that Warren refers to his Dominionists scheme as
a "Second Reformation." The father of the first Reformation, Martin
Luther, was actually an unconscious agent of secularization. Under
Catholicism, the truth had become the province of priests and other
self-proclaimed "mediators of God." However, Luther made the mistake of
adopting nominalism as one of the chief philosophical foundations for
his doctrines. In The Western Experience, the authors write:
[S]ome of Luther's positions had roots in nominalism, the most
influential philosophical and theological movement of the fourteenth
and fifteenth centuries, which had flourished at his old monastery.
(450)
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/CNP_Dominionism2.htm
or
http://tinyurl.com/2veo5c
#-----------------------------------------------------
Regards,
LelandJ
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Sunday 18 March 2007 11:24 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>
>> If I understand it correctly, it is the Attorney General that decides
>> which organizations are subversive. The President of the United States
>> appoints the Attorney General. If the President of the United States,
>> and a substantial number of his appointees, were members of a subversive
>> organization, it is unlikely that the Attorney General would classify
>> the organization as subversive. This is a dilemma. To make matters
>> worse, it is the President that is commander and chief of our Armed
>> Forces. That the Commander and Chief of our Armed Forces is a member of
>> a subversive organization is very dangerous to our Constitutional
>> Democratic Federation.
>>
>> The religious righters, especially the Dominionist, are closely aligned
>> with, and controlled by the Neoconservatives.
>>
>
> Hi Leland!
>
> Just wait until next year when all the Ds will be falling over themselves to
> get the "moderate" votes. "Subversives? We don't see no subversives!"
>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
