> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2105307,00.asp
> Well, it's a great endorsement, but sadly wrong: "For open-source > developers the good news is that this will put the heart of one of the > strongest DBMS engines and languages into their hands." > > If only. Is this guy terribly confused, or is this new news as of today? The only thing I heard being 'shared sourced' was code built on top of VFP, and not the core VFP itself. If VFP itself were to be 'shared' or 'open' source, that would be huge news, and absolutely excellent news for us-- finally I could get in there and actually fix some of the bugs I still experience(yes, I code in C/C++ as well as Fox). ;-) -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
