"it is six times as efficient and produces one-tenth the pollution, all
while achieving the same performance and acceleration"

dream on - I just don't trust their figures - why are their vehicle
efficiency figures better than three times the opposition, *and* their
well-to-wheel figures better than two times? And gas extraction, pumping,
gas turbine (presumed) efficiency loss, electrical tranformer/
transmission/ transformer losses give an overall 52.5% efficiency? - I
would take a lot of convincing, and that's well-to-battery-charger. Then
their mileage is quoted as 110 Wh/km - I assume that's
watt-hours/kilometer:
say 0.177 kw-h/mile - at 60mph that's 10.6kw/hour - say 14 horsepower, not
exactly earth shaking!

I'll say it again <sigh> an electric (battery) car has *got* to be less
efficient and therefore more polluting than one that runs on the fuel you
use to generate the electricity to charge the batteries, and that's before
you factor in the energy cost of lugging the batteries around - not my
opinion, the laws of physics.

Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP
  - AndyD        8-)#


**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries.

**********************************************************************



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to